Home / Politics / “Cyber Wars 2025: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict”

“Cyber Wars 2025: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict”

Kashmir has long been a flashpoint between India and Pakistan. A major terror attack in Pahalgam on 22 April 2025 (26 tourists killed) triggered escalation.In the aftermath, the confrontation shifted partly into cyberspace: beyond just artillery and missiles, both sides appear to have engaged in digital/spectral operations.
Thus the term “cyber war” is being used to describe the wave of attacks, counter-attacks, data breach claims, website defacements and information-operations around this conflict because pakistan has defeat the war from india then it takes this type of method like cyber war 

Here are some of the most concrete / widely reported data-points: The regional cyber-agency of the Indian state of Maharashtra reported over 1.5 million (15 lakh) cyber-attack attempts on Indian websites traced to Pakistan-linked hacking groups (and other countries) following the Pahalgam attack. India Today +2 The Times of India +2 Of these ~1.5 million attacks, only about 150 were officially reported as “successful” (i.e., achieving their objective) according to Indian authorities. India Today +2 The Times of India +2 Example of breach claims: A Pakistan-based hacker collective called Pakistan Cyber Force claimed to have accessed sensitive data from Indian defence-institutions such as Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) and Military Engineer Services (MES). Also a website belonging to Armoured Vehicles Nigam Limited (AVNL) was defaced. India Today +1 On the Indian side: Defence and private sector agencies heightened their cyber-defence posture: expanding threat-intelligence, real-time monitoring, tracking maritime/transport/financial systems. India Today +1 Specific tactics noted: malware campaigns, DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks, website defacements, GPS-spoofing, phishing, misinformation campaigns

🔍 Methods & Features of the Cyber-Conflict

Volume over precision: Many attacks appear exploratory or “spray and pray” in nature: 1.5 million attempts but only ~150 successes. This suggests many are blocked / ineffective. Hybrid tactics: It’s not just about hacking systems — the conflict also involves disinformation, defacements, false claims (e.g., power-grid take-down), and micro-targeting of institutions. The Times of India Critical infrastructure concern: Although claims include power grids, airports, election commissions, many independent analyses say the actual disruption was minimal or unverified. mint +1 Focus on defence/PSUs: Institutions linked with defence, military-personnel, veterans, public sector undertakings have been targeted (or claimed to be targeted). Information war / psychological warfare: The cyber front also aims to create fear, undermine trust, degrade morale, spread uncertainty. Cross-border attribution and deniability: While many attacks are attributed to Pakistan-linked groups by Indian agencies, verifying state-sponsorship is complex; many claims are unverified or exaggerated

Tagged:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *